JAHID NOOR S/O SHRI MOHAMMAD NOOR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9718/2025 · 2025-10-09
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41830 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41830 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41078] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9718/2025 Jahid Noor S/o Shri Mohammad Noor, Aged About 28 Years, R/o House No. 116, Chhuttan Ka Chouraha, Kali Paltan, Gaindi Ki Chowki, Tonk, Police Station Kotwali, District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramit Pareek with Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 09/10/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 354/2023 registered at Police Station Phagi District Dudu for the offence(s) under Sections 8, 21 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the charge-sheet has been filed and applicant is in custody ever since 08.07.2025. Learned counsel further submits that recovered quantity of the contraband is less than the commercial quantity. There is single criminal antecedent other than NDPS Act registered against the applicant. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful
[2025:RJ-JP:41078] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9718/2025] purpose would be served by keeping the accused-applicant behind bars till disposal of the case.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that the applicant is in custody ever since 08.07.2025; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the quantity of contraband is less than commercial quantity and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Jahid Noor S/o Shri Mohammad Noor shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /48