RAVINDER BANGA v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
TEST.CAS./18/2023 · 2025-10-14
Amit Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41828 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41828 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
TEST.CAS. 18/2023 p. 1 $~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A. 32081/2025 IN + TEST.CAS. 18/2023 RAVINDER BANGA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arpit Sharma, Mr. Anant Sharma, Mr. Aman Sharma Advs. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 19.12.2025 I.A. 32081/2025 (seeking correction of the judgment dated 14th October, 2025)
1. This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking correction of the errors that crept into the judgment passed by this Court on 14th October,
2025.
2. The errors in the aforesaid judgment as pointed out in the present application are as follows: i. In paragraph no. 15 of the said judgment, the date of the Will has been wrongly recorded as ‘8th September, 2024’, instead of ‘8th September, 2014’. ii. In paragraph no. 9 of the said judgment, the petitioner/ Ravinder Bagga has wrongly been described as one of the attesting witnesses to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2025 at 12:39:05
TEST.CAS. 18/2023 p. 2 the Will instead of beneficiary. iii. In paragraph nos. 10 and 11 of the said
judgment, the petitioner/Ravinder Bagga has wrongly been described as one of the attesting witnesses to the Will.
3. I have seen the record. These are inadvertent errors that that have crept in the aforesaid judgment.
4. Accordingly, paragraph nos. 9, 10, 11 and 15 of the judgment dated 14th October, 2025 are corrected and shall read as follows:
“9. Evidence by way of affidavits dated 22nd February 2023 of the attesting witness, Mr. Devender Kumar (PW-1) and the petitioner, Mr. Ravinder Banga (PW-2) were filed along with the petition. To be noted, the petitioner is one of the beneficiary to the Will of the testatrix.
10. The statement of No Objection by the respondent no.2, for the grant of probate of the Will of the testatrix, has been recorded before the Joint Registrar on 7th February, 2024. The statements of the attesting witness, Mr. Devender Kumar (PW-1) and the petitioner, Mr. Ravinder Banga (PW-2), have also been recorded by the Joint Registrar on 6th May, 2025.
11. In the statement of PW-1, PW-1 has stated that the subject Will was signed and executed by the testatrix in the presence of PW-1, who appended his signature to the Will thereafter. It is further asserted that at the time of execution, the testatrix was in good health and sound mind and executed the said Will out of his own free will, in the presence of PW-1 and the other attesting witness, Mr. Ravinder Kumar Balaggan.
15. Subject to the petitioner filing the requisite Court Fees, let the Letter of Administration be issued upon the petitioner in respect of the Will of the testatrix dated 8th September 2014.”
5. The application stands disposed of.
AMIT BANSAL, J DECEMBER 19, 2025 at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2025 at 12:39:05