Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41827 (RAJ)

GHAMANDI S/O ARJUN LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13620/2025 · 2025-10-17

Sameer Jain

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42767] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13620/2025 1. Ghamandi S/o Arjun Lal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Gambhira, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 2. Inderraj S/o Ghamandi, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Gambhira, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 3. Shaitan S/o Prabhu @ Fabbu, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Gambhira, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. 4. Ramesh S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Gambhira, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 17/10/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 83/2020 registered at Police Station Malarna Dungar District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 427, 452, 354, 336, 379 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that two times investigation was carried out and inspite of the same, applicants are not charge-sheeted. Furthermore, it is submitted that on application under Section 319 of CrPC, considering the eye [2025:RJ-JP:42767] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13620/2025] witnesses statements and other evidences, concerned Court has found applicant to be accused in the present case and he is straightway been called by way of arrest warrant. 3. Additionally, it is submitted that in the instant matter, next date before the learned trial Court is 01.11.2025. 4. In the facts and circumstances and relied upon the judgment enunciated in Inder Mohan Goswami Vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 3658/2004, this Court deems it appropriate to convert the non-bailable warrants into bailable warrants. 5. Accordingly, present bail application is disposed of. It is directed that applicant shall mark his presence on the said date before the learned Trial Court and learned Trial Court is at liberty to take appropriate decision in accordance with law. Till the next date of hearing before the learned Trial Court i.e. 01.11.2025, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /370