[2025:RJ-JP:3248] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1008/2025 Prince Kumar Saini @ Pintu S/o Late Shri Daulatram Saini, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Suman Vihar, Sarai Bawdi, Delhi Road, Amar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Parth Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 22/01/2025 Parties are present in person before the court. 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 230/2024 registered at Police Station Amer, District Jaipur(North) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 427, 379, 447 and 120-B of IPC, the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that petitioner and complainant have arrived at compromise and the same has been executed and submitted before the concerned investigating officer, therefore anticipatory bail of the petitioner may be allowed. 3. It is contended by counsel for the complainant that anticipatory bail application of the petitioner may be allowed with a condition that he shall be abide by the conditions as narrated in the agreement (compromise) arrived at between the petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:3248] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1008/2025] and the complainant, any breach of the condition shall give a right to the complainant to reach the court for cancellation of the bail application of petitioner. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 5. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the fact that petitioner and complainant have arrived at compromise and executed the agreement and submitted it before the concerned investigating officer, therefore without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner subject to the condition that any breach of condition mentioned in the agreement, shall give right to the complainant to approach the competent jurisdiction court for cancelling the bail. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Prince Kumar Saini @ Pintu S/o Late Shri Daulatram Saini, in connection with FIR No.230/2024 registered at Police Station Amer, District Jaipur(North) he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishs a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and [2025:RJ-JP:3248] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1008/2025] (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /29