M/s Jasmitha Industries (P) Limited, v. M/s Padmavathi Cotton Ginning Mill,
CRP/2779/2025 · 2025-12-25
R Raghunandan Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41819 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41819 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010558472025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2779/2025 Between:
1. M/S JASMITHA INDUSTRIES (P) LIMITED,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SALURI RAMBABU, DOOR NO.20-18-385/22, 2ND LANE, D.S. NAGAR, ETUKURU ROAD, BESIDES NH-5, GUNTUR.
2. SALURI RAMBABU,, S/O SANGEETHA RAO, AGE 52 YEARS OCC MANAGING DIRECTOR, DOOR NO.74-2-161, R. AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. M/S PADMAVATHI COTTON GINNING MILL, REP. BY ITS PROP.
GUMMA SIVAIAH, WALCOTT DADA NAGAR, B.J.T, DOOR NO.20- 18-385/22, 2ND LANE, D.S. NAGAR, ETUKURU ROAD, BESIDES NH-5, GUNTUR.
2. GUMMA SIVAIAH, S/O SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC PROPRIETOR M/S PADMAVATHI COTTON GINNING MILL, R/O DOOR NO.4-24-44/3, 7TH LANE, MUTHYALAREDDY NAGAR, GUNTUR.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the orders dated 08.10.2025 passed in I.A.No.814 of 2025 in O.S.No.1371 of 2025 on the file of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Guntur
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant temporary injunction directing the respondent /defendant and his henchmen not to interfere with the petitioner’s peaceful possession of the suit schedule premises till the disposal of the suit, pending disposal of the above CRP Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. YENNAM SUDHEER BABU
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the main suit itself is closed and consequently, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
26.12.2025
MJA
25
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2779/2025
26.12.2025
MJA