Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41809 (RAJ)

GARIMA BEDI W/O SHRI KARSAN BEDI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6513/2025 · 2025-10-09

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41097] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6513/2025 1. Garima Bedi W/o Shri Karsan Bedi, R/o D-2/2204,cleo County, Sector 121,noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar Uttar Pradesh- 201301. 2. Karsan Bedi S/o Shri Tavinder Jeet Bedi, R/o D- 2/2204,cleo County, Sector 121,noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar Uttar Pradesh- 201301. ----Accused/Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent 2. Shafeek Kagzi S/o Mohammed Rafiq Kagzi, R/o 167, Kagzi Colony, Near Bijli Kuwa, Sanganer, Jaipur- 302029 ( Proprietor M/s Kagzi Handmade Paper Industries). ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Misha Sharma for Mr. Shubham Khunteta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP Mr. Vikas Gurjar for Mr. Deepak Chauhan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 09/10/2025 This criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioners for quashing the FIR No.983/2024 dated 04.12.2024 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted the settlement deed dated 10.09.2025 executed in between the [2025:RJ-JP:41097] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6513/2025] parties for perusal of this Court. The settlement deed is taken on record. Referring to the aforesaid settlement deed, learned counsel submits that the private dispute of civil nature has amicably been settled between the parties and prays for quashing of the FIR. The respondent no.2/complainant-Shafeek Kagzi, present in person and identified by his learned counsel, acknowledging the contents of the settlement deed dated 10.09.2025, submits that in view of amicable settlement of dispute between the parties, he has no objection if the subject FIR is quashed. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsels for the respective parties, the settlement deed dated 10.09.2025, statement of the complainant and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Others: (2012) 10 SCC 303, this Court deems it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The FIR No.983/2024 dated 04.12.2024 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) is quashed and set aside. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/61