113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3348-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 04.04.2025 TANIA AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jaspal Singh Guru, AAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This criminal writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents No. 2 and 3 to restrain respondents No. 4 to 6 from interfering in the life of the petitioners as they are in live in relationship. Learned State Counsel has informed the Court that statements of the petitioners have been recorded, as per the same, now there is no threat perception. In view of the above, counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the instant petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 04.04.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.04.05 06:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document