Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41804 (RAJ)

ARUN KUMAR MEENA SON OF LATE SHRI KAJODMAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2971/2025 · 2025-05-19

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21098] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2971/2025 Arun Kumar Meena Son Of Late Shri Kajodmal Meena, Resident Of Bada Gaon Bhatiya, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur (Raj).presently Resident Of Flat No. 301, High Tech Residency Mandir Marg, Sector 10, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Kiran Meena Daughter Of Late Shri Kajodmal Meena, Resident Of 83, IFS Villa Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar- Greater Noida (U.P). Permanent Resident Of 4 Shanti Vihar, Saraswati Nagar, Jawahar Circle Jaipur City (East) (Raj). ----Complainant/Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 19/05/2025 The crux of the matter is that the present FIR is made to be registered by the complainant stating that there has been forgery of documents due to which a civil dispute is ongoing inter se the parties who are real brother and sister. Albeit the present petition has been for quashing of the said FIR, after arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner has made an alternative prayer and has submitted as there are disputed questions of fact, directions for fair, impartial, and efficacious investigation in the matter in hand. Accordingly, it is [2025:RJ-JP:21098] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2971/2025] directed that on 26.05.2025, the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Superintendent of Police at 11:00 AM in his office. The concerned Superintendent of Police shall grant due audience to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders as deemed essential and carry further the investigation in accordance with law. It is made clear that no prejudice shall be caused on account of the aforementioned alternative prayer. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/114