CRM-19723 CRM-M-18195 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 Udayveer State of Haryana Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Present: Mr. for the applicant Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in the present application, filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, is for withdrawal of the main petition bearing CRM 2. Notice in the application. 3. On asking of the Court, Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent present application is allowed. 4. For the reasons mentioned in the application and in view of the submissions made, the present application is allowed and the date of hearing of main case bearing CRM and the same is taken on board for hearing today itself. CRM-M-18195 1. Prayer in the present petition 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.309 dated 05.12.2024, re 19723-2025 in/and 18195-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Haryana Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Kartar Singh, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present application, filed under Section 528 of is for withdrawal of the main petition bearing CRM Notice in the application. On asking of the Court, Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that he has no o present application is allowed. For the reasons mentioned in the application and in view of the submissions made, the present application is allowed and the date of hearing of main case bearing CRM-M-18195-2025 is pre and the same is taken on board for hearing today itself. 18195-2025 Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.309 dated 05.12.2024, registered under Sections 109(1), 333, 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-19723-2025 in/and CRM-M-18195-2025 Decided on:15.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Prayer in the present application, filed under Section 528 of is for withdrawal of the main petition bearing CRM-M-18195-2025. On asking of the Court, Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts State and submits that he has no objection if the For the reasons mentioned in the application and in view of the submissions made, the present application is allowed and the date of hearing of 2025 is pre-poned from 23.07.2025 to today and the same is taken on board for hearing today itself. , filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.309 dated gistered under Sections 109(1), 333, 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section - 1 - ...Petitioner ...Respondent Prayer in the present application, filed under Section 528 of the 2025. On asking of the Court, Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts bjection if the For the reasons mentioned in the application and in view of the submissions made, the present application is allowed and the date of hearing of 2025 to today , filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No.309 dated gistered under Sections 109(1), 333, 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.15 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-19723 CRM-M-18195 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act (Section 27 of the Arms Act added later on), at Police Station Mundkati, District Palwal. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawa of the present petition. 3. Allowed to do so. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn accordingly. May 15, 2025 vinod* 19723-2025 in/and 18195-2025 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act (Section 27 of the Arms Act added later on), at Police Station Mundkati, District Palwal. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawa of the present petition. Allowed to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn accordingly. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act (Section 27 of the Arms Act added later on), at Police At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawa Dismissed as withdrawn accordingly. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES - 2 - 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act (Section 27 of the Arms Act added later on), at Police At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.15 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document