Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41793 (KAR)

SOMASHEKHARA R v. NAVEEN KUMAR RAJU S (IAS)

CCC/847/2023 · 2025-12-11

Anu Sivaraman, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52637-DB C.C.C. No.847/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.847/2023 BETWEEN: SOMASHEKHARA .R S/O LATE RAMA NAIKA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS PRESENTLY R/AT. PAVANA NILAYA 3RD CROSS, 9TH MAIN ROAD GOKULA EXTENSION TUMKUR - 572103 MOBILE 9035642238. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. RAMESH NAIK L, ADV.,) AND: NAVEEN KUMAR RAJU .S (IAS) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY (KREIS) NO.8, MSB- 1, 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR CUNNINGHAM ROAD BANGALORE - 560052. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. SHRIDHAR PRABHU, ADV.,) Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52637-DB C.C.C. No.847/2023 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFULLY DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 19.7.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN WA NO.693/2020 (S-RES) ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-B SO AS TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 19.07.2023 passed in W.A.No.693/2020. 2. The accused entered appearance and filed compliance affidavit. 3. The affidavit of Sri.Kantharaju P.S., I.A.S., indicate that the parties to the proceedings were litigating before the Division Bench and thereafter, the Hon'ble - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52637-DB C.C.C. No.847/2023 Supreme Court and thereafter they have filed an application for extension of time. 4. Considering the afore-stated facts and taking note of the fact that the order of the learned Single Judge which has been upheld by the Division Bench has been complied by issuing appointment orders, which is annexed with the affidavit, we are of the considered view that the delay in compliance is required to be condoned. Accordingly, the same is condoned. The compliance affidavit is accepted. The contempt proceedings are dropped. Notice issued to the accused stands discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR/List No.: 3 Sl No.: 40