2025:JHHC:22917 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.191 of 2025 1. Dr. Rinkee Kumari, aged about 43 years, Wife of Shiv Shankar Thakur, Resident of Village Sonar Toli, P.O. & P.S. Simdega, District - Simdega, Jharkhand - 835223. 2. Dr. Dheeraj Kumar Singh, aged about 43 years, Son of Ajay Kumar Singh, Resident of at Kshatriya Niwas, B-Block, Shivaji Nagar, Hethu, Late Ramanand Singh Lane, Near Birsa Munda Airport, P.O. and P.S.-Ranchi Airport, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand-834003. 3. Dr. Sachin Kumar Sahu, aged about 34 years, Son of Gandhi Prasad Sahu, Resident of at House No. 120 E, Main Road, Niche Bazar P.O. and P.S.-Simdega, District-Simdega, Jharkhand-835223. 4. Dr. Ashish Kumar, aged about 32 years, Son of Sri Lakhan Prasad, Resident of Noora Mandai Road, Hanuman Mandir Chowk, P.O.-Hazaribag, P.S.-Lohsinghna, District- Hazaribag, Jharkhand-825301. 5. Sumit Kumar, aged about 28 years, Son of Raj Kumar Puri, Resident of at Murkunda, P.O.-Murkunda, P.S-Gumla, District-Gumla, Jharkhand-835027. 6. Sabiel Lakra, aged about 46 years, Son of Late Pius Lakra, Resident of village- Urmi, P.O.-Dumardih, P.S.-Gumla, District-Gumla, Jharkhand-835207. ..… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Rahul Kumar Purwar, Secretary, Department of Higher Technical Education and Skill Development, having its office at Kusai, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District – Ranchi 3. Dr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Vice Chancellor, Ranchi University, having office at Kutchery Road, Ranchi, P.O.-G.P.O, P.S. Sadar, District - Ranchi. 4. Dr. Guru Charan Sahu, Registrar, Ranchi University, having office at Kutchery Road, Ranchi, P.O. - G.P.O, P.S. Sadar, District - Ranchi. .....Opposite Parties 2025:JHHC:22917 2 --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate : Ms. Oishi Das, Adv. For the University :Mr. Manoj Tandon, Adv. :Mr. Siddharth Ranjan, Adv. : Mrs. Neha Bhardwaj, Adv. For the State : Mr. M. K. Roy, G.A-I --------- 04/Dated: 08.08.2025 In view of the averment made in the show-cause filed by the respondent-University and College and considering that fresh appointment has already been made pursuant to the advertisement, as such the order passed by the Writ Court has now become infructuous. Accordingly, the contempt application is hereby, dismissed as infructuous. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Fahim/