IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 Meharwal Kivji Trust Faridkot Mukhtiar Singh and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) submits that the present second appeal has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such as, the appell existence. It is further submitted that the appellant the basis of a Will; which has been set aside by the Hon’ble Apex Court. the aforesaid submis as having been rendered infructuous. 02.04.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Meharwal Kivji Trust Faridkot Versus Mukhtiar Singh and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vikas Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate for the appellant(s). Ms. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the present second appeal has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such as, the appell existence. It is further submitted that the appellant the basis of a Will; which has been set aside by the Hon’ble Apex Court. Learned counsel for respondents N the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the appellant(s). In view of the above, the instant second appeal is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 02.04.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2180-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.04.2025 .… Appellant(s) .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vikas Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Mulwani, Advocate for the appellant(s). Ms. Prerna Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the present second appeal has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such as, the appellant-Trust is no longer in existence. It is further submitted that the appellant-Trust was created on the basis of a Will; which has been set aside by the Hon’ble Apex Court. Learned counsel for respondents No. 1 to 3 has not disputed sions of learned counsel for the appellant(s). In view of the above, the instant second appeal is disposed of Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the present second appeal has been rendered infructuous and Trust is no longer in Trust was created on . 1 to 3 has not disputed In view of the above, the instant second appeal is disposed of RISHU KATARIA 2025.04.03 12:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.