SATNAM SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/2313/2016 · 2025-10-09
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41786 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41786 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2313 of 2016 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Shri Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Prateek Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party No.2, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on the record.
2. Challenge in the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.163 of 2010 (Rajeev Kumar Rana vs. Mohan Singh and others), under Sections 379, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Afjalgarh, District-Bijnor, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina, Bijnor.
3. Today, Shri Prateek Kumar, learned Counsel for the opposite party No.2 has filed a supplementary counter affidavit dated 31.07.2018 duly served on Shri Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicants, stating therein that the parties have arrived at a compromise and no dispute any longer exists. The Opposite Party No.2 does not want to press the Complaint Case No.163 of 2010 (Rajesh Kumar Raina vs. Mahendra Singh and others) under Section 379, 504, 506 IPC, PS Afjalgarh District Bijnor pending in the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina, Bijnor.
4. Learned AGA could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. As the parties have entered into a compromise and the offences complained of are all compoundable with the person capable of compounding the offences, being opposite party No.2/deponent of the Supplementary Counter Affidavit, who as per the statement of Shri Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Prateek Kumar Satnam Singh And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Prateek Kumar still stands by the Supplementary Counter Affidavit sworn in the year 2018, no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case.
6. Accordingly, the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.163 of 2010 (Rajeev Kumar Rana vs. Mohan Singh and others), under Sections 379, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Afjalgarh, District-Bijnor, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagina, Bijnor, are hereby quashed.
7. The instant application is, accordingly, allowed. October 10, 2025 A. Pandey A482 No. 2313 of 2016 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad