Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010441182022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27101/2022 Between:
1. YADAGIRI MANGA, W/O NANAJI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE LABOUR, R/O ALLIPUDI VILLAGE 86 POST, KOTANANDURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE EAST GODAVARI DIST), A.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE AT KAKINADA, KAKINAD DISTRICT, A.P STATE. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SC/ST CELL-II, DISTRICT S.P OFFICE AT KAKINADA, KAKINAD DISTRICT, A.P STATE. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TUNI RURAL CIRCLE, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT, A.P STATE. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTANANDUR POLICE STATION, KOTANANDUR, KAKINADA DISTRICT, A.P STATE. 6. P SRINIVAS KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGE MAJOR, OCC. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTANANDUR POLICE STATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 7. CHINTAKAYALA VISWANADHAM CHINA BABU, S/O S.H.N.V.V PRAHALLAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O 3- 142, NEAR RAMALAYAM, VELMA COLONY, ALLIPUDI VILLAGE, KOTANANDURU MANDAL, KOTANANDURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 8. CHINTAKAYALA NARAYANA MAHESH, S/O S.H.N.V. PRAHALLAD, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O 3-142, NEAR RAMALAYAM, VELMA COLONY,
ALLIPUDI VILLAGE, KOTANANDURU MANDAL, KOTANANDURU MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V KRISHNA SWAROOP Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2
The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and , 3 in not registering FIR against the respondents No. 6, 7 86 8 for insulting, illegal detention, humiliation, assaulted, abused in filthy language and discriminated in the name of caste by Mala Community as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of principles of natural justice besides violative of Article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India and pass such”
2. Heard Sri. V. Krishna Swaroop, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in the light of the interim direction given by this Court, police are not calling the petitioner and his family members to the police station.
He further submitted that the enquiry officer has enquired into the matter and came to the conclusion that there is no further action to be taken on the representation made by the petitioner. Further, a detailed report is submitted to the Superintendent of Police, Kakinada District, for further necessary steps. 4. Recording the said submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the police to follow the due process of law, if any crime registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. 3
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.10.2025 rsd
4
94 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.27101 of 2022
Dt.30.10.2025
rsd