[2025:RJ-JP:33319] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2207/2025 1. Ramratan Son of Shri Narendra Singh, Aged About 24 Years, Resident of Dhani Kumharan, Rajgarh, Police Station Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.). (At Present In District Jail, Jhunjhunu.) 2. Naresh Kumar Son of Late Shri Hariram, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Ward No. 24, Pilani, Police Station Pilani, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (At Present In District Jail, Jhunjhunu.) ----Appellants Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor 2. Sonu Son of Shri Subhash, Aged About 29 Years, Resident of Kedia Colony, Dhindhwa Road, Police Station Pilani, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Bhati for Mr. Kamlendra Sihag For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/08/2025 1. The instant appeal is filed by the appellants under Section 14A (2) of SC/ST (POA) Act in a matter arising out of FIR No. 205/2025 at P.S. Pilani, District Jhunjhunu for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 307, 324(2) and 189(2) of BNS and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (PoA) Act. 2. Learned counsel for appellants submitted that appellants are falsely implicated in present case. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the complainant, having a criminal [2025:RJ-JP:33319] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-2207/2025] background, blown the CCTV installed at the accused's house while in an intoxicated condition. When the appellants tried to stop him, he fled on a motorcycle but later skidded due to his intoxicated state. It is further submitted that the scratches on the motorcycle also indicate that the injuries were a result of skidding. He also submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the appellants. He also submits that the disposal of case will take its own time and keeping appellants behind the bars would serve no purpose so they are entitled to be released on bail. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and he submitted intimation slip to complainant and further report received from concerned Police Station. 4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 5. On basis of report registered by complainant Sonu on 27.07.2025 about incident of 26.07.2025, the matter is investigated and these appellants-accused were arrested. There is no criminal antecedents against the appellants accused. 6. In view of discussion made hereinabove, without expressing any opinion on merits, I am of considered view that it is a fit case wherein appellants can be enlarged on bail. The appeal under Section 14-A SC/ST (PoA) Act is allowed and impugned order dated 07.08.2025 is hereby quashed and set aside. The appellant accused Ramratan Son of Shri Narendra Singh and Naresh Kumar Son of Late Shri Hariram are released on bail till disposal of criminal case arising out of above mentioned FIR with the condition that each of them would execute a personal bond in the sum of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each to the [2025:RJ-JP:33319] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-2207/2025] satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in trial court on date fixed by trial court and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:- (i). That after release of appellants accused on bail, they will not indulge in any criminal activity and if it is found that they are involved in any criminal activity, the order shall be recalled. (ii). That they will appear before the trial Court on each and every date of hearing till the disposal of criminal case. (iii). That if the appellants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court. (iv). Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court. (v). The appellants shall not influence prosecution witnesses in any manner. 8. Misc. Application, if any, stands disposed of. 9. A copy of this order be sent through E-mail to the trial court. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/296