09.06.2025 Sl No. ML-1 Court No.8 (sg) MAT 1679 of 2022 The Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan -vs- Dr. (Mrs.) Tanuka Das & Ors. Mr. Victor Chatterjee Mr. Barnamoy Basak …for the appellant Mr. Pradip Kumar Roy, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sumedha Mukhopadhyay Ms. Shruti Mitra …for the writ petitioner Mr. Anik Kr. Gupta …for the UGC 1. This matter has come up at the instance of the writ petitioner for correction of the order dated 20th May, 2025. 2. There are various arithmetical and clerical mistakes crept in the order dated 20th May, 2025. The relevant corrections have been mentioned hereinbelow: i) In the first line of paragraph 2 of the said order, instead of “Assistant”, it should be “Associate”. ii) In the second line of paragraph 2 of the said order, instead of “December 4, 2018”, it should be “December 4, 2011”. iii) In seventh line of the order the word “He” should be replaced by the word “She”. iv) Since there are some clerical mistakes crept in the sentence started in 9th line, the sentence should be read as follows: “The difficulty arose when the selection committee drastically reduced the average of marks from 28 to 18 and 30 to 20 whereby it differs from the marks given by the expert committee.” v) The paragraph 6 of the said order should be replaced by the following paragraph: “The particulars of marking by the expert committee under the heading “Contribution to Research” are as follows: a) Professor of English, West Bengal State University (Retd) 8+7+6+6+6 = 33 out of 50 b) Professor, Department of English, Kalyani University 4.5+04+3.5+04+ 04 = 20 out of 50 c) Professor, Department of Bengali, Calcutta University (Retd) 62% i.e. 31 out of 50 Total = 84 out of 150 i.e. average 28 out of 50 2 vi) Let these corrections be incorporated in the order dated 20th May, 2025. Server copy of the said order shall also be corrected accordingly. vii) Remaining portions of the said order shall remain unaltered. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Smita Das De, J.) 3