Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41766 (AP)

Smt. Reddy Swathi v. Reddy Srinivas

CRLRC/2739/2015 · 2025-12-15

Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010183422015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2739/2015 Between: 1. SMT. REDDY SWATHI, W/O. SRINIVAS, D/O. BACHU APPA RAO, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KAPULAPETA, UNDI VILLAGE, UNDI MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. REDDY SRINIVAS, S/O. BHIMA RAJU, AGRICULTURAL COOLIE, R/O. NIDAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. REDDY SATYVATHI, W/O. BHIMA RAJU, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NIDAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. REDDY BHEEMA RAJU, S/O. RAMULU, CULTIVATION, R/O. NIDAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SMT BARIROTHU CHANDRAKALA, W/O. BHASKARA RAO, CULTIVATION, R/O. OPPOSTIE KIMBERLEY CONVENT, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SRI BAIROTHU BHASKARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN, EMPLOYEE IN SC.RAILWAY, R/O. OPPOSTIE KIMBERLEY CONVENT, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 6. SMT MULLUR SLUGUNA, W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, R/O. REST HOUSE ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. SRI MULLU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. NARASIMHA MURTHY, MEDICAL SHOP, R/O. REST HOUSE ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. SRI REDDY APPA RAO, S/O. RAMULU @ RAMANNA, CULTIVATION, R/O. NIDAMARRU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2739/2015 O R D E R: 1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted a memorandum, for withdrawal of the instant Criminal Revision Case (for short Crl.R.C.,). 2. Heard the learned Counsel, perused the impugned Order under challenge. 3. It appears that in DVC No.19 of 2011 initiated by present Petitioner, learned Jurisdictional Magistrate i.e., the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bhimivaram, has passed and Order under Sections 21, 17 and 22 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The Petitioner challenged the Order in Appeal before the appropriate Appellate Forum. The Appeal was dismissed. Hence, the instant Crl.R.C.,. 4. Now, learned Counsel for the Petitioner on record, has placed one memo containing inter-alia that the matter was settled outside the Court, amicably. 5. Considering the memo, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA KS Dated 16.12.2025. 4 143 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2739/2015 Dated:16.12.2025 KS