KAMAL THROUGH HIS MOTHER v. UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ANOTHER
CWP/11022/2024 · 2025-04-30
Kuldeep Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41760 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41760 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-11022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(255)
Kamal through his mother Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI
1.
order/letter dated 16.02.2024 (Annexure P distribution licencee, wherethrough, on account of the injuries suffered due to electrocution, only a sum of Rs.1,40,000/ Fetching grievance from the inadequate compensation, petition, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, before this Court.
2.
respondents No.1 and 2, instructions imparted to him by Mr. Aditya Kundra, Executive Engineer, Sub Division, UHBVN, Panipat 08.07.2019, calculation has been made,
11022-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Kamal through his mother
Versus Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate and Mr. Arnav Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2-UHBVN. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition,
order/letter dated 16.02.2024 (Annexure P distribution licencee, wherethrough, on account of the injuries suffered due to electrocution, only a sum of Rs.1,40,000/ etching grievance from the inadequate compensation, under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, before this Court. Upon notice of the instant petition, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2, has caused appearance and informs this Court, on instructions imparted to him by Mr. Aditya Kundra, Executive Engineer, Sub Division, UHBVN, Panipat, that in view of the Clause 12 of the policy dated , as adopted by the respondent calculation has been made, and in fact, the petitioner, in addition to the already
4 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-11022-2024 Date of Decision : 30.04.2025
…Petitioner Versus another
...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Vivek Saini, Advocate and UHBVN. petition, a challenge is thrown to the
order/letter dated 16.02.2024 (Annexure P-9), passed by the respondent distribution licencee, wherethrough, on account of the injuries suffered due to electrocution, only a sum of Rs.1,40,000/-, was awarded to the petitioner. etching grievance from the inadequate compensation, the instant writ under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed Upon notice of the instant petition, learned counsel for the has caused appearance and informs this Court, on instructions imparted to him by Mr. Aditya Kundra, Executive Engineer, Sub that in view of the Clause 12 of the policy dated as adopted by the respondent-distribution licencee, fresh and in fact, the petitioner, in addition to the already
a challenge is thrown to the 9), passed by the respondent distribution licencee, wherethrough, on account of the injuries suffered due to , was awarded to the petitioner. the instant writ has been filed Upon notice of the instant petition, learned counsel for the has caused appearance and informs this Court, on instructions imparted to him by Mr. Aditya Kundra, Executive Engineer, Sub that in view of the Clause 12 of the policy dated fresh and in fact, the petitioner, in addition to the already MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.01 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CWP-11022
awarded amount, is be disbursed to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. 3. satisfaction with regard to the calculation. However, he still agitated on account of non deciding the claim of the petitioner. 4. compensation has already been decided, no further intervention of this Court is required, at this stage. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the respondent-distribution licencee, the interest part. 5. endeavour to decide the same
6. be entitled for the interest amount, the same shall be released forthwith, in his favour. 7. April 30, 2025 Manpreet
11022-2024 awarded amount, is found entitled for Rs.19,07,410/ be disbursed to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. At this stage, learned counsel for satisfaction with regard to the calculation. However, he still agitated on account of non-calculation of interest part, as there is a deciding the claim of the petitioner. Be that as it may, since the main issue of inadequate compensation has already been decided, no further intervention of this Court is required, at this stage. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the distribution licencee, by filing an apt representation, with regard to the interest part. In case, such a representation is filed, the latter, shall make all endeavour to decide the same, within a period of four weeks thereafter. It goes without saying that in case, the be entitled for the interest amount, the same shall be released forthwith, in his Consequently, the instant writ petition is
, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
4 2 entitled for Rs.19,07,410/-, and the said amount will be disbursed to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today. is stage, learned counsel for the petitioner though records satisfaction with regard to the calculation. However, he still agitated on calculation of interest part, as there is an inordinate delay in , since the main issue of inadequate compensation has already been decided, no further intervention of this Court is required, at this stage. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the iling an apt representation, with regard to In case, such a representation is filed, the latter, shall make all within a period of four weeks thereafter. in case, the petitioner is still found to be entitled for the interest amount, the same shall be released forthwith, in his Consequently, the instant writ petition is disposed of.
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No
, and the said amount will the petitioner though records satisfaction with regard to the calculation. However, he still agitated on n inordinate delay in , since the main issue of inadequate compensation has already been decided, no further intervention of this Court is required, at this stage. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the iling an apt representation, with regard to In case, such a representation is filed, the latter, shall make all petitioner is still found to be entitled for the interest amount, the same shall be released forthwith, in his
MANPREET SINGH 2025.05.01 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment