THALAPALA PENCHALAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/28187/2025 · 2025-11-13
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41760 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41760 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010542382025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 28187 OF 2025 Between:
1. THALAPALA PENCHALAIAH, S/o.Ramaiah, Aged 39 years, Occ- Business, R/o.H.No.28-5-122, Simhapuri Colony, Mypadu Road, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District.
2. Thalapala Rajendra, S/o.Ramaiah, Aged 37 years, Occ- Business, R/o.H.No.28-11-770, Bhagath Singh Colony, Venkateswarapuram, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District. ...Petitioners AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.
2. Andhra Pradesh Southern Power DistributionCompany Limited APSPDCL, Srinivasapura- Thiruchanoor Road, Tirupathi, rep.by its Chairman and Managing Director.
3. The Superintendent of Engineer, APSPDCL, Operation Circle, SPSR Nellore District.
4. The Assistant Engineer, APSPDCL, Haranadha- Puram Section, SPSR Nellore District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR ENERGY
2
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri Pamarthi Kameswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri K. Ashok, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL.
2. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking to consider the Mee-seva Application dated 15.08.2025. The Respondent Nos.2 to 4 have filed the Counter Affidavit on 24.10.2025.
3. Sri K. Ashok, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL has drawn the attention of this Court to Para No.6, wherein it has been stated that vide Office Order dated 03.09.2025, the Application of the Writ Petitioners has been rejected. Having taken note of the same, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners submits that the Writ Petitioners intends to challenge the Proceeding of the Respondent dated 03.09.2025 rejecting the Mee-seva Application.
4. In this view of the matter, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the Writ Petitioners to challenge the Proceeding bearing Lr.No.AEE/O/HNP/ F.No./D.No.966/25, dated 03.09.2025. No Order as to Costs.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 14.11.2025 JKS
3
59
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No. 28187 OF 2025
14.11.2025
JKS