Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41759 (MAD)

A.M.Thukaram v. T. Senthamizh Selvan

CRL OP/10055/2025 · 2025-04-03

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 10055 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-04-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN CRL OP No. 10055 of 2025 in CRL A SR No.19837 of 2025 A.M.Thukaram S/o. A.P. Mayakrishnan, 19, Mangesh Street, T.nagar, Chennai 600 017 Petitioner(s)s Vs T. Senthamizh Selvan S/o. M. Thilagarajan, B-14, Vembuli Apartment, South Lock Street, Kotturpuram, Chennai- 600 085 Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 419 (4) of B.N.S.S. 2023 to grant Special Leave to Prosecute the above appeal before this Court against the order of acquittal dated 20.01.2025 made in STC No.2637 of 2022 on the file of the learned XXVII Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court for Trial of Cases under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act) Saidapet, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Manoharan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10055 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner/ complainant to grant Special Leave to Prosecute the appeal in Crl.A.No.19837 of 2025 before this Court against the order of acquittal dated 20.01.2025 made in STC No.2637 of 2022 on the file of the learned XXVII Metropolitan Magistrage (Fast Track Court for Trial of Cases under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act ) Saidapet, Chennai. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he filed a complainant in STC No.2637 of 2022 on the file of the learned XXVII Metropolitan Magistrage (Fast Track Court for Trial of Cases under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act ) Saidapet, Chennai. against the respondent for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act whereas, the learned Magistrate dismissed the case by judgment dated 20.01.2025 and acquitted the respondent and hence, challenging the judgment of acquittal, the petitioner wants to file an appeal and therefore, the present petition has been filed seeking grant of special leave. 3. A reading of the materials shows that the respondent/accused has not denied the signature found in the disputed cheque and also the execution and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10055 of 2025 that there are arguable grounds raised in the grounds of appeal. 4. Hence, special leave is granted. 03-04-2025 ksa-2 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No Note: Registry is directed to take the appal if the papers are otherwise in order. To The XXVII Metropolitan Magistrate (Fast Track Court for Trial of Cases under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act) Saidapet, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 10055 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN,J. ksa-2 CRL OP No. 10055 of 2025 in CRL A SR No.19837 of 2025 03-04-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis