Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010223142025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1325/2025 Between:
1. G PEDDANNA,, S/O G NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC (RETIRED DISTRICT REGISTRAR) R/O D.NO.13-2- 819,T3.SRINIVASA NAGAR, RAMBO RESIDENCY ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT, A P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. MR P SREENI VASULU, THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT PUTTAPARTHY (ANANTAPURAM)
2. MR H K DHANUNJAY KUMAR, THE SUB TREASURY OFFICER HINDUPUR
MUKKIDIPETA HINDUPUR DISTRICT - (ANANTAPURAM)
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly, and deliberately of violating the Order dated 7-01-2025 passed in W.P.No.31072 of 2024 in the interest of justice, IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Pleased to recall the bailable Warrant issued on 22-08-2025 against the petitioner herein in C.C.No1325 of 2025 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to recall the bailable Warrant issued on 22-08-2025 against the petitioner herein in C.C.N0I325 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KRISHNA RAO M Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. G RAJU The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above contempt case is filed complaining the violation of the order dated 07.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.31072 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 07.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.31072 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 14.11.2025 TVN
102 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.1325 OF 2025
Date: 14.11.2025 TVN