Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41749 (RAJ)

SHANKAR LAL S/O GANGAVISHAN v. SHRIDHAR @ SARDAR S/O BADRI LAL

CW/20281/2025 · 2025-12-19

Bipin Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51500] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20281/2025 Shankar Lal S/o Gangavishan, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Khuntla, Tehsil Gangapurcity, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) At Present Under Employment In Dubai, United Arab Amirat (UAE) Through Power Of Attorney (Wife), Smt. Kaushlya W/o Shankar Lal, Aged 49 Years, R/o Bairwa Basti, Khuntla, Tehsil Gangapurcity District Sawaimadhopur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shridhar @ Sardar S/o Badri Lal, R/o Lohiya Mill, Gangapurcity 2. Deepak @ Golu S/o Shridhar @ Sardar, R/o Lohiya Mill, Gangapurcity 3. Virendra @ Veeru Toda (Todabhim Wale) S/o Kedar Lal, (Ex-Pardhad), R/o Ganesh Nagar, Gangapurcity 4. Laxminarayan S/o Rameshwar Prasad, R/o Patal Dauna Gali, Opp. Shwetambar Jain Mandir, Gangapurcity 5. Om Prakash @ Chautala S/o Ramnath, R/o Near Khandelwal Dharmshala, Gangapurcity 6. Sewaram S/o Rameshwar Prasad, R/o Purani Anaj Mandi, Gangapurcity, Tehsil Gangapurcity, District Sawaimadhopur 7. Satish S/o Mitun Lal, R/o Near Truck Union Choraha, Gangapurcity 8. Pawan Kumar S/o Manak Chand, R/o Near Purani Nagar Palika, Gangapurcity 9. Nagar Parishad, Gangapurcity, Through A. Commissioner, Nagar Parishad Gangapurcity B. Chairman, Nagar Parishad Gangapurcity ----Respondents/Defendants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 19/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, without joining issue on the merits of the case, submits that his application for temporary injunction is pending before the learned Trial Court, though the [2025:RJ-JP:51500] (2 of 2) [CW-20281/2025] prayer for interim relief has already been rejected. He further submits that the learned Trial Court may be directed to decide the application for temporary injunction independently, without being influenced by the order dated 10.07.2025. 2. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to decide the application for temporary injunction pending before it within a stipulated period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, provided that service upon the defendants is complete. 3. It is further made clear that while deciding the application for temporary injunction, the learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the order dated 10.07.2025. 4. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /32