Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:44893
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10355 of 2025 1 - Smt. Ajeta Gupta W/o Shri Deepak Kumar Gupta Aged About 46 Years Teacher L.B. (Art), Govt. Middle School Nawagarh, Block - Lundra, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Block-3, 1st Floor, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director (Education) Surguja Division, Ambikapur, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Surguja (Ambikapur), District - Surguja Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Surguja (Ambikapur), District - Surguja Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Education Officer Block - Ambikapur, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice
Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.
Order on Board 03/09/2025
1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 06.06.2025, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Middle School-Nawagarh, Block ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:53:59 +0530
2 Ambikapur, District Surguja to Govt. Middle School-Jarakela, Block-Lundra, District Surguja, under the rationalization instructions.
2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted a Committee headed by the Director, Public Instructions, vide notification dated 08.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 08.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period.
3.
Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated
08.07.2025.
4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 08.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner by passing the reasoned order. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok