Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4174 (BOM)

MR. PREM CHANDRA UPADHYAY THR HIS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MRS. MEGHANA J. VAITY v. MRS. URVASHI RAJESH SHAH

CP/793/2025 · 2026-08-28

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15-CP-793-2025.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.793 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.12184 OF 2024 Mr. Prem Chandra Upadhyay Thr. His Constituted Attorney Mrs. Meghana J. Vaity …Petitioners Versus Mrs. Urvashi Rajesh Shah …Contemnor Mr. Mangesh Naik a/w Vishaka Tiwari, for the Petitioners. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATED : 28th August 2026 PC:- 1. Heard the learned Counsels for the parties. 2. In terms of the order dated 03rd March 2025, it is admitted before me that the suit premises are vacated in terms of Para 5 of the order. However, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the directions for arrears has not been complied with. 3. The Petitioners at liberty to execute the order and recover the arrears, as available in law. Page 1 Akash 15-CP-793-2025.DOC 4. Considering the above observations the Contempt Petition is disposed of. 5. No case is made out for initiating contempt proceedings. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] Page 2 Akash