CRM-M No.235 IN THE 252 Madan Lal and o State of Haryana CORAM : HON Present: Mr. Mr. for t Mr. Mr. for *** NAMIT KUMA 1. The Cr.P.C. seeking Sections 323, 4 Kurukshetra and compromise date 2. The 3. Vide the trial Court/Il statements and t Since the parties could not be rec No.42508 of 202 23586 of 2021 (O&M) -1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM-M N Date of De and others Versus ryana and another HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Mr. Ishnoor Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** UMAR, J. (ORAL) The petitioners have filed the inst eking quashing of FIR No.474 date , 498-A IPC at Police Station K and all subsequent proceedings ar se dated 25.01.2021 (Annexure P-2). The matter is pending since 2021. Vide order dated 12.09.2024, partie ourt/Illaqa Magistrate on or before 15 and the report from the said Court arties did not appear before the said C recorded. On an application filed of 2024, another opportunity for reco 1- NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH M No.23586 of 2021 (O&M) e of Decision:05.02.2025 ... Petitioners ... Respondents AMIT KUMAR ryana. e instant petition under Section 482 dated 17.11.2018 registered under tion Kurukshetra University, District arising therefrom, in view of the 2). parties were directed to appear before fore 15.10.2024 for recording of their Court was sought before 05.11.2024 said Court, therefore, their statements filed by the petitioners, being CRM r recording statements of parties was s 482 under istrict of the before f their .2024. ements CRM es was PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.06 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh CRM-M No.235 granted vide orde be deposited with statements have b 4. Face to withdraw the p of action, at an ap 5. Dism February 05, 20 Pankaj* 23586 of 2021 (O&M) -2 e order dated 05.11.2024, subject to p ed with the Haryana State Legal Servic have been recorded nor costs has been Faced with this situation, learned co w the present petition with liberty to fi t an appropriate stage. Dismissed as withdrawn with afores , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2- ct to payment of costs of Rs.5000/- Services Authority. However, neither s been deposited. ned counsel for the petitioners wishes ty to file a fresh one on the same cause aforesaid liberty. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No to neither wishes cause PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.06 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh