Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41738 (BOM)

NARAYAN SHANKAR RANJANE v. SUREKHA NAMDEO DHAPTE AND ORS

IA/16204/2024 · 2025-03-28

Shri Jitendra Shantilal Jain, Shri M S Sonak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 5.IA.16204.24.docx Revati IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 16204 OF 2024 Narayan Shankar Ranjane …Applicant Versus Surekha Namdeo Dhapte & Ors. …Respondents IN THE MATTER BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION NO.3838 OF 2019 Surekha Namdeo Dhapte & Ors. …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents ______________________________________________________ None for the applicant. Ms P N Diwan, AGP for the State. ______________________________________________________ CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 28 March 2025 PC:- 1. None for the applicant or for the original petitioner. Ms. Diwan learned AGP appears for the state. 2. We have perused the interim application. The applicant claims that he is a project affected person and on account of the present petition has raised grievance that he has not been allotted the alternate land. Accordingly, he has prayed that he 2 5.IA.16204.24.docx should be allowed to intervene in this petition as respondent. 3. We allow this application in terms of prayer clause (a) and direct the original petitioner to implead the applicant as respondent no.8 in Writ Petition No.3838 of 2019. 4. Necessary amendment to be carried out within 2 weeks. Reverification is dispensed with. 5. The applicant is permitted to file the affidavit in the main petition by giving advance copy to the learned counsel for the petitioner. Interim application is disposed of. (Jitendra Jain, J) (M.S. Sonak, J)