HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 60408 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to institute appropriate proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Accordingly, with the aforesaid leave, the writ petition (PIL) is consigned to record. September 10, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vidya Kant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Govind Narayan Tiwari (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Hari Narayan Patel .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad