Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41734 (RAJ)

DINESH @ CHANDU S/O RAMPHOOL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13141/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13141/2025 Dinesh @ Chandu S/o Ramphool, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ahamadpura @ Naya Gaon, Police Station Mehandwas, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present in District Jail, Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia -PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No.191/2025 registered at Police Station Mehandwas, District Tonk wherein he has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 189(2), 326(g) and 331(8) of BNS, 2023 and subsequently he has been charged for the offence under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 331(8), 109(1) and 115(1) of BNS. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the injured Kalluram has not sustained any grievous injury on the vittal parts of his body. Counsel submits that after investigation, chargesheet has been submitted. Counsel submits that the other co-accused persons namely Siyaram and Mukesh have already been granted indulgence of bail by the trial Court. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13141/2025] trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that injured has not sustained any grievous injury and the other co-accused persons namely Mukesh and Siyaram have already been granted bail by the trial Court and also considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and that the trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Dinesh @ Chandu S/o Ramphool arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/230