APHC010206252019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8965/2019 Between: 1. MUTYALA GANGADHAR RAO, S/O. VENKAT RAO ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION PEYYERU VILLAGE, MUDENEPALLI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, S.N PURAM, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. ADDEPALLI KIRAN KUMAR, S/O. RAMA SESHAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O. DOOR NO. 60-9-3, 6TH LINE SIDDARTHA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. HANUMARA PERNEEDU, S/ O. VENKATA SHIVA RAMA KRISHNA BHANU PRASAD AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O. PEYYERU VILLAGE, MUDENEPALLI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or orders, Direction or Direction to declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not to take any further action in FIR No.487 of 2016 dated 17-09-2016 before the respondent against the respondents No. 4 to 5 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Art.14 and 21 of Constitution India and violation of Principle of Natural Justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to take further action on the FIR and pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honble Court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to file charge sheet in FIR No.487 of 2016 dated 17-09-2016 before the 3rd respondent against the respondents No. 4 to 5 disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARLU GADA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.8965 OF 2019 ORDER: Learned counsel representing Sri Venkateswarlu Gada, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI Date: 18.11.2025 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI 28 WRIT PETITION No.8965 OF 2019 Dt.18.11.2025 W PSK