COCP-6406 IN THE HI 108 Ravneet Sh. Moneesh CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW another’ wh respondent N behalf of the well reasons of certified c 2. refers to the of Sh. Mon Training, Pu dated 04.09 (Annexure R been partly a 6406-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o Versus oneesh Kumar, IAS and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. HK Aurora, Advocate for th (through V.C.). Mr. Amtiaz Sandhu, AAG, Pun I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 04.09.2025 (Annex CWP-26273-2025, titled as ‘Ravn whereby the writ petition was dis dent No. 2 to treat the said writ pe of the petitioner and decide the sam easons order within a period of three m tified copy of the said order. At the very outset, learned cou to the compliance report dated 19.02.2 . Moneesh Kumar, Director Technic ng, Punjab, to submit that in complia 04.09.2025 (Annexure P-1), Speak xure R-1) has been passed whereby t artly accepted. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-6406-2025 Date of Decision: 11.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA e for the petitioner , Punjab. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Ravneet vs. State of Punjab and as disposed of with a direction to rit petition as a representation on e same by passing a speaking and hree months from the date of receipt ounsel for the respondent-State 19.02.2026 filed by way of affidavit echnical Education and Industrial ompliance of the Writ Court order Speaking Order dated 14.01.2026 reby the claim of the petitioner has ging Writ and n to on and eipt tate avit trial rder has RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.11 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-6406 3. 4. required to b of, according 5. Speaking O law, if so adv 6. 7. 11.03.2026 rishu 6406-2025 -2- Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. The petitioner would be at libe Order dated 14.01.2026 (Annexu so advised. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid nnexure R-1), in accordance with any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No are sed said with RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.11 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.