IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 RSA No. 212 of 2001 (O&M) Date of decision:20th May, 2025 Joginder Singh ..Appellant Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA. Present: None for the appellant. Mr. R.S. Pandher, Addl. AG Punjab. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J(Oral) 1. This case pertains to the year 2001 and falls in the category of old cases. 2. Despite notice issued to learned counsel for the appellant, no one has been putting in appearance on behalf of appellant since 29.08.2024. 3. As per instructions of learned State Counsel and report of Registry, the appellant has already retired and reported to have expired on 19.05.2021. 4. No application for bringing on record legal representatives of the appellant has been filed. 5. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 7. However, liberty is reserved to the legal representatives of appellant to move an application to revive the appeal in case any cause of action survives. 8. Pending application (s) if any also stand disposed off. 20th May, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) reema JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No REEMA SAINI 2025.05.21 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh