BALKAR PURI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/18056/2025 · 2025-04-02
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41716 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41716 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SR. No.105
CRM-M-18056-2025 Date of decision:02.04.2025 Balkar Puri and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT Present: Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioners.
N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J.
1. Petitioners pray for grant of pre-arrest bail in FIR No.30 dated 04.03.2025 registered under Sections 115/118(1)/126/190/191(3) and 324 (4) of BNSS, 2023 (Sections 115/126 of BNSS deleted and Sections 115(2)/117(2)/126(2) and 304 of BNSS added later on) at Police Station Sadar Ratia, District Fatehabad.
2. On an advance notice, Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, DAG, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and submitted that a cancellation report has already been prepared in the present case and the custody of the petitioners is not required by the police any more.
3. In view of the statement made by the learned State counsel,
learned counsel for the petitioners contends that he does not intend to press the instant petition at this stage.
MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2025.04.02 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CRM-M-18056-2025 -2-
4. Dismissed as not pressed.
5. In case, the custody of the petitioners is required by the police at any stage, an advance notice of 07 days shall be issued to the petitioners before effecting their arrest.
(N.S. SHEKHAWAT) 02.04.2025 JUDGE mks Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable:
YES / NO MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2025.04.02 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh