HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13125/2025 Patanga @ Kulhad S/o Shri Ahmad, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Nadrai, Police Station Kotwali, District Kasganj, Uttar Pradesh. (Presently Confined At District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Singh Tomar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No.54/2025 registered at Police Station Nihalganj District Dholpur wherein he has been charged for the offence punishable under Section 303 (2) of BNS, 2023 and subsequently he has been charged for the offence under Sections 303(2) and 112 of BNS. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13125/2025] 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate and also considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Patanga @ Kulhad S/o Shri Ahmad arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. 7. In case, the petitioner is found involved in committing and repeating the same offence again in the future, the Learned Public Prosecutor and State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail before the Jurisdictional Court. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/226