Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4171 (AP)

AKRUTHI SRINIVASA RAO v. SRI SRINIVASA RAO

CC/187/2025 · 2025-07-16

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

T APHC010028322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187 OF 2025 Contempt case U/s. 10 to 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for wilfully violating and disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 31/10/2023 in WP No.28562 of 2023. Between: 1. Akruthi Srinivasa Rao, S/o.A.Sambasiva Rao, Aged about 44 years, Occ. Carpenter, R/o.Hanumanpet, Bhatiprolu Village and Mandal, Bapatia District. 2. U.Thirtha Nageswara Rao,, S/o.U.Vasudeva Rao, Aged about 42 Occ. Ice Cream Vendor, R/o.Hanumanpet, Bhatiprolu Village and Mandal, Bapatia District. 3. Manduri Kameswara Rao,, S/o.M.Venkata Subba Rao, years, Occ. Agriculture Coolie, Mandal, Bapatia District. years. Aged about 43 R/o.Hanumanpet, Bhatiprolu Village and ...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS AND Sri Srinivasa Rao, S/o.not known to the Petitioner, Tahsildar, Battiprole Mandal, Bapatia District. Aged major, Occ. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS / Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI V CH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent: SMT SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following ORDER : , i y ^ . ¥\'. . \ ■ % -9^ %r- / t. * / / / / ■!* f, APHC010028322025 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ./ ■ [3332] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 187/2025 Between: 1.AKRUTHI SRINIVASA RAO. S/O.A.SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. OCC. CARPENTER, R/O.HANUMANPET, BHATIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 2.U.THIRTHA NAGESWARA RAO. S/O.U.VASUDEVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. ICE CREAM VENDOR, R/O.HANUMANPET, BHATIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. 3.MANDURI KAMESWARA RAO. S/O.M.VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O.HANUMANPET. BHATIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.SRI SRINIVASA RAO, S/o.not known to the Petitioner, Aged major, Occ. Tahsildar, Battiprole Mandal, Bapatia District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents herein for willfully, deliberately and intentionally violating and flouting the Orders of this Hon’ble High Courts dated 31.10.2023 in WP No.28562/2023 under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VCH NAIDU Counsel for the Contemner: 1.SUSHMAYAGANTI 3 The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 31.10.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.28562 of 2023. Sri V.Ch.Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that pursuant to the filing of this Contempt Case, the authorities have passed orders dated 18.12.2024 directing the petitioner to vacate the subject premises, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication. He further submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge the said orders before appropriate forum. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the orders dated 18.12.2024 passed by the respondent, in accordance with law, before appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. SD/- K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Sri Srinivasa Rao, S/o.not known to the Petitioner, Aged major Occ. Tahsildar, Battiprole Mandal, Bapatia District. I / .f 2. OneCCto SRI. V CH NAIDU Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SMT. SUSHMA YAGANTI Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies TAC \ HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025 ORDER CC NO. 187 OF 2025 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE