115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA KALSUM AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Ms Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner HARPREET SINGH BRAR CRM-W-437-2025 Allowed as prayed for. MAIN CASE 1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondent to protect the life and liberty of the Nos.4 to 11 i.e. private respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are major and further submits that and having three children, but due to some matrimonial dispute, she was residing in her parental home and children were residing with her husband. such, both the petitioners are residing together, said relationship is not acceptable to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH KALSUM AND ANOTHER V/S HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Ms. Neha Bindal, Advocate with Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate for Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 2025 Allowed as prayed for. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondent to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent 11 i.e. private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are major and are living together in a live further submits that petitioner No.1 is already married with respondent No. and having three children, but due to some matrimonial dispute, she was residing in her parental home and children were residing with her husband. both the petitioners are residing together, said relationship is not acceptable to respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3260-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 02.04.2025 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondent Nos.1 to 3 petitioners from the hands of respondent Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the are living together in a live-in relationship. She is already married with respondent No.4 and having three children, but due to some matrimonial dispute, she was residing in her parental home and children were residing with her husband. As both the petitioners are residing together, in live-in relationship but the respondent Nos.4 to 11 and they are MANISHA 2025.04.02 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRWP-3260-2025 threatening the petitioners with dire consequences. The petitioners apprehend danger to their l submitted a representation dated No.2 but no action has been taken so far. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. 4. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the counsel appearing for the State during the course of the day. 5. Without commenting on the validity of their relationshi entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to to decide the repr of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for vio April 02, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 2025 (O & M) 2 petitioners with dire consequences. The petitioners apprehend danger to their life and liberty from respondent bmitted a representation dated 30.03.2025 (Annexure P but no action has been taken so far. Notice of motion to official respondents only. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the counsel appearing for the State during the course of the day. Without commenting on the validity of their relationshi entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P rom the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance with law. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable petitioners with dire consequences. The petitioners apprehend Nos.4 to 11 and in this regard, (Annexure P-3) to respondent Notice of motion to official respondents only. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioners is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the counsel appearing for Without commenting on the validity of their relationship and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 petitioners (Annexure P-3) within a period rom the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance with law. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the lation of law, if any committed by them. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.04.02 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment