Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41702 (RAJ)

ARVIND S/O JASRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13116/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13116/2025 Arvind S/o Jasraj, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bawdikheda, Police Station Anta, District Baran (Raj.). (At Present Con- fined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA/PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.187/2025, reg- istered at Police Station Anta, District Baran wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 110, 352, 3(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the alleged offences are under sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 110, 352, 3(5) BNS, but the injured have not sustained any grievous injury on their vital parts of the body and the grievous injuries sustained by them was found to be on non-vital part i.e. on hand. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.09.2025 and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13116/2025] 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the injured have not sustained any grievous injury on their vital parts of the body and the grievous injuries sustained by them was found to be on non-vital part i.e. on hand and looking to the fact that the petitioner is custody since 23.09.2025 and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Arvind S/o Jasraj arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipula- tion to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/219