Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41702 (PNJ)

SATNAM SINGH v. GURMEET SINGH

RSA/2059/2001 · 2025-09-09

Virinder Aggarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (217) SATNAM SINGH GURMEET SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Appellant is not appearing since 13.01.2006 and notice issued to the appellant received back with the report of his death, so, in such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by k 2. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with they are interested to continue with the appeal, they can m application to revive the 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. 09.09.2025 S. Pathania Whether reasoned / Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: Versus GURMEET SINGH -.- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL None for the appellant. Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Appellant is not appearing since 13.01.2006 and notice issued to the appellant received back with the report of his death, so, in such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with the liberty that in case, if there are they are interested to continue with the appeal, they can m to revive the appeal within a period of three months from today. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2059-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision:-09.09.2025 … Appellant ... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Appellant is not appearing since 13.01.2006 and notice issued to the appellant received back with the report of his death, so, in such circumstances, no useful purpose the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of that in case, if there are any LR(s) of appellants and they are interested to continue with the appeal, they can move appropriate within a period of three months from today. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. Appellant is not appearing since 13.01.2006 and notice issued to the appellant received back with the report of his death, so, in such circumstances, no useful purpose Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of of appellants and ove appropriate SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.09.10 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document