Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41702 (AP)

CHERUKURI VASANTHA KUMAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/24512/2025 · 2025-11-06

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010465482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 24512/2025 Between: 1. CHERUKURI VASANTHA KUMAR, S/O C PATTABHI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O D.NO.24-86, SAI NAGAR COLONY, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, TIRUPATHI. 3. THE SUBREGISTRAR, CHANDRAGIRI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. V MADHAN MOHAN, S/O LATE V.MUNASWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O KOTALA VILLAGE AND POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. S ARJUNIAH, S/O S VENKATASUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O KOTALA VILLAGE AND POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. S SYAMALA, W/O S ARJUNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O KOTALA VILLAGE AND POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. S GEETHA, D/O S ARJUNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O KOTALA VILLAGE AND POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. S PURUSHOTHAM, S/O S ARJUNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O KOTALA VILLAGE AND POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. S SWATHI, D/O S ARJUNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/O KOTALA VILLAGE AND POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 herein in trying to receive the documents for registration from the Respondents No.4 to 9 herein pertaining to Agriculture land to an extent of Ac.5.00.cts on S.No.327/5 (old S.No.327) of Nagapatia Village account, Rangampeta Village Panchayat, Chandragiri Mandal, Tirupathi District, pending the suit O.S No.88 of 2013, on the file of the X Additional District Judge, Tirupathi, is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Registration Act, 1908 and the rules made their under and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 and 3 herein, not to entertain documents for registration from the Respondents No.4 to 9 herein pertaining to Agriculture land to an extent of Ac.S.OO.cts on S.No.327/5 (old S.No.327) of Nagapatia Village account, Rangampeta Village Panchayat, Chandragiri Mandal, Tirupathi District, pending the suit O.S No.88 of 2013, on the file of the X Additional District Judge, Tirupathi and pass…” 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 07.11.2025 klk 30 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.24512 of 2025 07.11.2025 kkllkk