Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41701 (AP)

Ika Lakshmi Narayana Swamy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/29180/2025 · 2025-10-29

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010563392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29180/2025 Between: 1. IKA LAKSHMI NARAYANA SWAMY,, S/O IKA VENKATAPPADU, AGED 47 YEARS, OECUPATION AUDITOR, R/O D.NO. 10-335/274, SRI SHIDI SAI VETERINARY COLONY, BACK SIDE STATE BANK OF INDIA, VISALAKSHINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. DR. RONGALI VENKATESH,, S/O RONGALI VENKUNIDU (LATE). AGED 38 YEARS. OCCUPATION DOCTOR, R/O D.NO. 10- 385/117/14 TF-1, VISALAKSHINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETAIY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM.. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARILOVA POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. EMANDI SRINIDHI, D/O EMANDI APPALA RAJU, AGE ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/OD.NO 10-335/266, SRI SHIRDI SAI VETERINARY COLONY, VISALAKSHI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM-530043 5. ALPHA EDU CARE ABROAD CONSULTANCY, 50-39-6, BESIDE TVS OFFICE, TPT COLONY, BALAYYA SASTRI LAYOUT, SEETHAMMADARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 530013. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M V S ANIL KUMAR R Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No 2 -Commissioner of Police Visakhapatnam in 2 repeatedly summoning and harassing the Petitioners at the instigation of Respondent No.4 in connection with a contractual dispute between Respondent No.4 and 5 without following procedure without issuing any notice as illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and violative of Articles 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and contrary to provisions of Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and consequently direct the Respondent Nos 2 and 3 not to summon or harass the Petitioners in any manner and pass” 2. No representation for the petitioners. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that a crime has been registered against the petitioners in Cr.No.426 of 2025 for the offences under Sections 318 (4) BNS, 21 (3) of Banning of unregulated Deposit schemes Act, 2019. 4. Recording the said submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the police to follow the due process of law, in the crime which is registered against the petitioners. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.10.2025 rsd 3 104 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29180 of 2025 Dt.30.10.2025 rsd