APHC010148622022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8331/2022 Between: 1. K.RAMAKANTHA RAO, S/ O . RAJ AGOPALA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.SHOP NO.18, CENTRAL VEGETABLE MARKET, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE RAJAHMUNDRY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, RAJ AHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIATE, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare action of the Respondent Municipal Corporation in trying to evict the Petitioner from the Shop No.18, Central Vegetable Market, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District during subsistence of lease without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the Respondent not to dispossess the Petitioner from the Shop No.18, Central Vegetable Market, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District without following due process of law in the interest of justice. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent not to interfere with the business of the Petitioner in Shop No.18, Central Vegetable Market, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District without following due process of law pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P MADAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.12.2025 PNS