Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41691 (CHH)

M/S NARAYAN INDUSTRIES (A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3997/2019 · 2025-03-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14994 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3997 of 2019 • M/s Narayan Industries (A Proprietorship Firm) Through Sole Proprietor Mr. Mukesh Motwani S/o Shri Narayan Das Motwani, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Sanjay Ward, Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara, District Balauda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Food Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Dept, Mahanadi Bhawan, Sector 19, Rakhi-1, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited Through It's Managing Director, 880, Civil Lines, Raipur, Tahsil Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. District Marketing Officer, Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, District Office At Raigarh, Post And Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4. Collector (Food Branch) District Balauda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 4/ State For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer Mr. Ashish Surana, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28/03/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may please be direct the CG Markfed to make good the losses incurred by the petitioner firm. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may pleased be kind enough in quashing and setting aside the impugned circular Annexure P- 1. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may please be kind enough in directing the respondent No.1 to refund the money they have received from the petitioner’s Bank Guarantee with interest @ 18% per annum. 10.4 This Hon’ble Court may please be kind enough in granting any other relief, interest, compensation, damages & cost of petition.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti