Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41687 (RAJ)

BALBHARAM S/O SHRI GHASIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/1237/2025 · 2025-10-10

Avneesh Jhingan, Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41260-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1237/2025 Balbharam S/o Shri Ghasiram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Naya Gaon, Harmada, Police Station Bandar Sindri, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present In High Security Jail, Ajmer) Through His Nephew Pukhraj Jat S/o Shri Poluram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 819 Modi Walo Ki Dhani, Naya Gaon, Harmada, Police Station Bandar Sindri, Tehsil Roopangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through Its Chairman, District Magistrate, Ajmer. 3. Superintendent High Security Jail, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Heera Lal Prajapati for Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Dy. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 10/10/2025 1. This petition is filed aggrieved of rejection of the prayer for fifth parole. 2. The grievance raised is that the petitioner has suffered incarceration of more than thirteen years and seven months after complying with the condition of the earlier four paroles surrendered within time, yet the prayer for fifth parole has been rejected. [2025:RJ-JP:41260-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1237/2025] 3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate fairly submits that a circular dated 17.07.2025 has been issued with regard to considering the application for subsequent parole where the inmate had complied with the conditions of the earlier paroles. 4. In view of the above statement, the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted back to respondent No.2 to decide the application for fifth parole afresh in accordance with law taking into consideration the circular dated 17.07.2025. 5. It shall be appreciated if the application is considered and decided expeditiously not later than two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. This criminal writ petition (parole) is allowed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Riya/7