Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41685 (CHH)

VIJAY SHANKAR YADAV v. SMT. NILAM YADAV

CRR/1391/2019 · 2025-07-06

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:30938 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1391 of 2019 Vijay Shankar Yadav S/o Shri Ramkumar Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/ o Quarter No. 0188/d, Yadunandan Nagar, Tifra, Bilaspur, P.S. Sirgitti, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Smt. Nilam Yadav W/o Shri Vijay Shankar Yadav Aged About 27 Years C/o Father Jayprakaash Yadav, R/o Saket Nagar, Near Bhelwa Pond, Kohka Bhilai, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ku. Shristi Yadav Aged About 2 Years 9 Months, Through Guardian Smt. Nilam Yadav, W/o Vijay Shankar Yadav, R/o Saket Nagar, Near Bhelwa Pond, Kohka Bhilai, Durg, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav P. Shukla, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 07/07 /202 5 1. Heard Mr. Vaibhav P. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Punit Ruparel, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief: RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned order dated 03.10.2019, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. Let a copy of this order as well as original record of this case be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan