YUVRAJ ARJUN BARANGULE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
WP/3756/2018 · 2025-10-10
Sharmila U Deshmukh, Shri M S Karnik
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41680 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41680 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
11 Wp-3756-2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3756 OF 2018 Yuvraj Arjun Barangule.
...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra. ...Respondent. —————— Mr. A. A. Naik, APP for the Respondent-State. ——————
Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ. Date : October 10, 2025.
P. C. :
1. None for the Petitioner.
2. Learned APP, on instructions, submits that there have been some subsequent developments and during the course of investigation it was revealed that there is no necessity to proceed against the present Petitioner. In this view of the matter, nothing survives for
consideration in the present petition. Petition is disposed of. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] [M. S. Karnik, J.] Patil-SR 1 of
1