Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002462025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/52/2025 The Union of India and 2 Ors represented by Ministry of Defence Secretary, Govt of India, 101-A, South block, New Delhi 2: The Joint Secretary Age: Occupation : Ministry of Defence (BR Wing) Govt of India (Formerly designated as Secretary BRDB) Sena Bhawan B Wing New Delhi 110011 3: The Director General Age: Occupation : Border Roads Seema Sadak Bhawan Ring Road Delhi Cantt New Delhi 11001 VERSUS Vimal Goswami Son of Late H G Goswami, presently residing at 6268, Block G, Near International Airport, Aerocity, Sastri Nagar (Mohali), Rupnagar Sadar, Rupnagar, Punjab 140306
Advocate for the Petitioner : Marto Kato, Advocate Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. Idak Bam, Advocate
Page No.# 2/2 – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 28-04-2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, C.J.) The matter comes up for consideration of IA(Civil) No.52(AP)/2024 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with the prayer for condonation of delay of 80 days in filing the connected writ appeal. Learned counsel for the sole respondent has filed objection to the condonation application. However, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the contents of the application as well as the reply to the application, we are of the view that the delay in filing the connected writ appeal is liable to be condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 80 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. The interlocutory application is disposed of.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant