APHC010686322025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35405/2025 Between: 1. DURGASI KRISHNAVENI, W/O VENKATA APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O 6-42, CHANDRAM PALEM, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. P. VIJAYA LAKSHMI,, W/O GOVINDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O 2-6/1, NAGARAPU PETA, CHOLLANGI PETA, DENKADA, VIZIANAGARAM. 3. THOTHADI VENKATA PRASAD,, S/O YALLAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEAR, R/O 4-36, NAGARAPU PETA, CHOLLANGI PETA, DENKADA, VIZIANAGARAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB REGISTRAR, ANANDAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 5. PILLA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC SONTYAM VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 to 4 in illegally mutating and continuing the names of respondent No.5 and his family members in the revenue records, including 1-B, ROR, pattadar passbooks and online records, in respect of land admeasuring Ac.4.80 cents in Survey No.347 of Shontyam Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct respondents 2 and 3 to delete the said illegal entries and restore the names of the petitioners after due verification of original and previous records, and pass…” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners filed an application through PHRS seeking correction of entries in the revenue records and also submitted a physical representation on the same date. Despite the same, the respondent authorities have neither considered the said application nor conducted any enquiry with regard to the entries made in favour of the unofficial respondents. 4. Considering the same, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission by directing the respondent authorities, more particularly the 3rd respondent, to consider the representation and complaint dated 06.10.2025 submitted by the petitioner along with the physical representation, after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, conduct an enquiry, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 20.12.2025 klk 103 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.35405 of 2025 20.12.2025 kkllkk