Pulivarthi Venkatamaniprasad alias Nani, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/19423/2019 · 2025-11-02
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41665 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41665 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010405052019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 19423/2019 Between:
1. PULIVARTHI VENKATAMANIPRASAD ALIAS NANI,, S/O.
LATE P. NAGARAJA NAIDU,AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, DISTRICT PRESIDENT, TELUGU DESAM PARTY, R/O.
PULIVARTHIVARIPALLI, PAKALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SECURITY REVIEW COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS CONVENOR INSPECTOR
GENERAL OF POLICE (INTELLIGENCE), VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE INTELLIGENCE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
..RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
T NAGARJUNA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.19423 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the proceedings issued by the 3rd Respondent herein in proceedings ID.No.5890/SW-2/AP/2015-19, dated 21.11.2019 as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the guidelines in GO Rt. No.655, dated 13.03.1997 issued by the 1st Respondent and consequently direct the Respondents to continue 2 2 Security Officers to the Petitioner.”
2.
Learned counsel representing Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the matter has become infructuous.
3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
4. The submissions of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner are placed on record.
5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition has become infructuous, and liable to be dismissed.
3
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.11.2025 PSK
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
41
WRIT PETITION No:19423 OF 2019
Date: 03.11.2025
W PSK