Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41662 (ALL)

SAGEER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/4761/2025 · 2025-07-02

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103704 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4761 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sageer Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jamil Ahamad Azmi,Mohd Umar Farooq Counsel for Respondent :- Abhishek Krishna,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Ms. Mariyam Azmi, Advocate holding brief of Jamil Ahamad Azmi, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Abhishek Krishna, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5, learned Standing Counsel for State. 2. This Court has passed following order on 16.04.2025 :- "Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner superannuated from service on 31.12.2024 and his retiral dues/service benefits have not been released till date and is being made to run from pillar to post for seeking his lawful entitlements. Shri Abhishek Krishna, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 and 5 and learned Standing Counsel to obtain instructions regarding the cause for failure of the respondents to disburse the retiral dues/service benefits to the petitioner to which he is lawfully entitled. The instructions shall also disclose the amounts under different heads, manner of computation and date of disbursal of the aforesaid amounts in the tabulated form. Put up this case on 28.05.2025 in the list of fresh cases. " 3. Sri Abhishek Krishna, learned counsel for respondent on basis of instruction submits that substantial amount has been paid and for requisite direction for payment of remaining amount, papers are sent to Director Local Bodies, U.P. Government, Lucknow, however, till date no approval has been granted. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for State submits that requisite approval in accordance with law will be granted within short period and in case of any legal impediment, the same will be communicated to petitioner. 5. In the aforesaid circumstances, since grievance of petitioner is being substantially addressed and for remaining grievance, matter is seized with respondent No.2, the Court takes note of above submission on behalf of the State, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that all retiral benefits be cleared within short period. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 P. Pandey Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad