APHC010572842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30013/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK MOHIDDIN, S/O SHAIK ABDUL RAHIM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO. 18-94, 12TH WARD, SUBEDAR STREET, PUNGANURTOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, MADANAPALLI ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RURAL POLICE STATION MADANAPALLI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring inaction of the and 4th respondent is not considering the petitioner representation dated 05.09.2025 and not take any action against the named accused in the complaint as being as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21of Constitution of India, and consequently praying his Honble Court to direct the respondent nos. 3 and 4 to take necessary action against the real culprits in accordance with law and to 2 grant such other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in circumstances of the case.” 2. Heard Sri P.V.Venkata Ravi Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that on receipt of complaint made by the petitioner, police have conducted preliminary enquiry and that they have not registered any crime since the matter is civil in nature. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.11.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30013 of 2025 Dt.04.11.2025 Asr