Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41655 (KAR)

SRI. PERUMAL K v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18023/2022 · 2025-11-27

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49202 WP No. 18023 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.18023 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. PERUMAL K S/O LATE C KANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT 1ST CROSS, ANWAR COLONY BHADRAVATHI – 577 301 SHIMOGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJ D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE M. S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIMOGA DISTRICT SHIMOGA – 577 201 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SHIMOGA SUB DIVISION SHIMOGA - 577 201 4. THE SECRETARY AGRICLUTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49202 WP No. 18023 of 2022 BHADAVATHI SHIMOGA – 577 301 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. NANDA KISHORE, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 08.08.2022 SENT THROUGH HIS ADVOCATE TO RESPONDENT NOS.3 AND 4 VIDE ANNEXURE-J, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY; b) ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO ACQUIRE THE PETITIONERS LAND MEASURING 18 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.69/1 OF SIGEEBAGI VILLAGE, BHADRAVATHI TALUK AND PAY NECESSARY COMPENSATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW TO THE PETITIONER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49202 WP No. 18023 of 2022 ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4, for considering the representation at Annexure-J. 2. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to consider the representation at Annexure-J in accordance with law within outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5